Ethnic cleansing, Israel style

Gov’t decision strips Palestinians of their East J’lem property

The Sharon government implemented the Absentee Property Law in East Jerusalem last July, contrary to Israeli government policy, since Israeli law was extended to East Jerusalem after the Six Day War.

The law means that thousands of Palestinians who live in the West Bank will lose ownership of their property in East Jerusalem.

Government officials estimate the assets total thousands of dunam, while other estimates say they could add up to half of all East Jerusalem property.

[…]


Source:

Meron Rappaport, Haaretz Correspondent
Last update — 15:01 20/01/2005
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/529510.html
/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?itemNo=529510

Racist legislation

Jan. 18, 2005

www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/528450.html

In the summer of 2003, the Knesset promulgated a disgraceful law. The amendment to the Citizenship Law applied a sweeping prevention of unification of families and marriages between Israeli Arabs and Arabs from the region. Since the law was passed by the votes of 53 MKs — including Shinui — there has been a total halt to any requests by Israeli Arab citizens, including those who were already married and had children, to enable them to live in Israel with their relatives.

In effect, the state left its Arab citizens only one choice: to live in another country with their non-Israeli spouses. The amendment institutionalized discrimination against Arabs compared to any other non-Jewish citizen. Since it was passed, Israeli citizens could marry any non-Jew in the world and live with them in Israel, but if they married Arabs “from the region,” they could not live as a family in Israel.

[…]

Money is a big factor

Stop ‘teaching’ the Holocaust

[…]

Type out the word “Holocaust” on Google and you’ll get about seven million hits. So don’t tell me we’ve failed to raise the Holocaust in the consciousness of mankind.

What we have failed to do is correctly assess the value of consciousness-raising.

The problem runs deeper. Sixty years after the Shoah, the Berlin Jewish community is still trying to get more money out of the German government. Money is a big factor in pedestrianizing the Shoah.

[…]

But the memorialization of Hitler’s victims has been sullied by the money it takes to keep Shoah-business in business.

Beyond making sure that the survivors receive their compensation checks, isn’t it time we said enough is enough?

The issue isn’t just money. When will we finally stop manipulating the Shoah for partisan purposes?

When MK Danny Naveh opposes a postage stamp marking Israel-Germany friendship because it doesn’t reference the Shoah, I don’t see his stance as honoring the memory of the martyrs or showing sensitivity to the survivors, but as demagoguery.

Another stamp bearing Shoah imagery isn’t what Israel needs.


Source:

Elliot Jager
January 14, 2005
This article was published originally in The Jerusalem Post.
web.israelinsider.com/Views/4810.htm
© 2001-2005 Koret Communications Ltd. All rights reserved.

Nazis! Nazis! Nazis!

Our overuse of the term ‘holocaust’ belittles the true horror of Nazism

Notebook by Mick Hume

January 14, 2005

www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,1054-1439509,00.html

[…]

Indeed, the farther into history the Second World War retreats, the more obsessed with Nazis the news seems to become. […]

[…]

[email protected]

Copyright 2005 Times Newspapers Ltd.

This reads just like fiction

Holocaust survivor to share his terrifying odyssey

By Steve Zalusky Daily Herald Staff Writer

Thursday, January 13, 2005

Posted 1/12/2005

www.dailyherald.com/search/main_story.asp?intid=3836466

The month was January, the year 1943.

[…]

On the run from the Germans, Morris Goldner and his father, Leap, had found their way to the home of a supposed friend.

The man turned out to be an informant who tied them up and had them taken to the train station to be shot by a German officer. Before he did his duty, the officer told the informant, “… these two may be Jews, but what I see in front of me are two human beings. And you make me come here to kill two innocent people?”

Trailing both his and his father’s blood into a nearby clump of bushes, Goldner encountered another man who would change his life.

[…]

In the forest, Goldner runs into a notorious Polish outlaw, recently escaped from Auschwitz, who teaches him how to use firearms and ultimately presses him into service with the Polish resistance.

In one chapter, Goldner, pretending to be wandering aimlessly, throws a grenade in the path of a transport carrying about a dozen German soldiers. In another chapter, the diminutive teenager squeezes into a coffin-like compartment beneath a train carrying Jews to Auschwitz, his purpose to take pictures for the resistance.

It read like a fictional adventure novel,” said Maxine Sukenik, who directs the temple’s adult education program. She said the temple is excited to get the increasingly rare opportunity to hear the stories of a survivor.

[…]

© 2005 Daily Herald, Paddock Publications, Inc.

At least he isn’t a Nazi

NJ accuses Holocaust lawyer of misusing money from two clients

NEWARK, N.J. — A lawyer who helped win billions of dollars for thousands of Holocaust victims has been accused by an attorney ethics panel of misusing money from two of those clients.

Edward Fagan, who gained worldwide attention for his role in litigation against Swiss banks and German corporations, could face sanctions up to disbarment if the charges are upheld.

“He stabbed me right in the back,” said Gizella Weisshaus, 75, who survived the Auschwitz death camp. “I supported him. He used me. He used my money.”

Efforts to reach Fagan for comment were unsuccessful. Several newspapers reported they could not contact him by phone or at his home on Monday. Fagan on Tuesday was no longer reachable at numbers he has used in the past. He has until February to respond to the charges brought by the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics.

The ethics office, part of the state Supreme Court, charged last month that Fagan misused $400,000 from Estelle Sapir and Weisshaus, of Brooklyn, N.Y., the initial plaintiff in the 1996 Swiss bank case. It became a class-action case and was settled in 1998 for $1.25 billion.

Fagan later was among lawyers who won billions from German corporations. He has since sued seeking money for suffering under South African apartheid and American slavery.

The attorney ethics office accused Fagan of draining Weisshaus’ trust account, then seeking to replace the money with funds from the settlement he had won for Sapir. The complaint also charged that he wrote checks to cash on Sapir’s account and transferred the money to business accounts.


Source:

Copyright © 2005, The Associated Press
www.newsday.com/news/local/state/ny-bc-nj–holocaustlawyer0111jan11,0,7667993.story?coll=ny-region-apnewjersey

Guilty! Guilty! Guilty!

Psychology of Holocaust examined

By SUZAN CLARKE

THE JOURNAL NEWS

(Original publication: January 10, 2005)

www.nyjournalnews.com/newsroom/011005/a0110auschwitz.html

NEW YORK — All of Holocaust-era German society — including military, governmental, civilian and corporate sectors — bore responsibility for the Nazi atrocities committed against Jews, leading scholars discussing the psychology and mentality of the time said yesterday.

[…]

Reach Suzan Clarke at [email protected] or 845-578-2414. Reach Suzan Clarke at [email protected] or 845-578-2414.


Webmaster note: It’s good to be the victor — you get to say anything you want about the vanquished. Given corporate involvement in the war effort in the U.S., can you imagine the claims that could have been made if the shoe was on the other foot? Also, note that the “leading scholars” are only concerned about “atrocities committeed against Jews.” No other victim groups need apply. Finally, the “atrocities” were committed by “Nazis,” that is, members of the Nazi political party. So, not only are these “leading scholars” attempting to make the Holocaust Jewish-only (years of claims that “the Holocaust” includes non-Jews notwithstanding), but they are also attempting to label every German of that time as a “Nazi.” Pretty nuanced, huh?